Looking back at my preliminary task i believe there is no comparison in the quality of work between that and my final product. My preliminary task, although it followed conventions of a basic magazine front page set up was not to a professional standard. The photo shop skills i used were little and basic while the contents page of the magazine i made was totally tacky cheap and very unprofessional looking. The colours on the page a dull and boring and the page is set out in a very un-inspiring way. The sizes of text on the page vary while text along the banner on the front page is difficult to read.
Wednesday, 28 April 2010
Evaluation 7. Looking back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to the full product?
Looking back at my preliminary task i believe there is no comparison in the quality of work between that and my final product. My preliminary task, although it followed conventions of a basic magazine front page set up was not to a professional standard. The photo shop skills i used were little and basic while the contents page of the magazine i made was totally tacky cheap and very unprofessional looking. The colours on the page a dull and boring and the page is set out in a very un-inspiring way. The sizes of text on the page vary while text along the banner on the front page is difficult to read.
Evaluation 6. What have you learnt about technologies from the process of constructing this product?
Evaluation 5. How did you attract / address your audience?
Evaluation 4. Who would be the audience for your media product?
Evaluation 3. What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
Evaluation 2. How does your media product represent particular social groups
Evaluation 1. In what ways does your media product use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?
On my contents page my page will again follow convention, with a varity of pictures and text in a organised format it looks like a basic contents page from any other actual magazine. When comparing my magazine to Other music magazine mine doesnt follow the totally same conventions as they do. However when looking at mine in comparison to NME's contents page i can see mine is totally different to theres, however i believe that mine is alot more appealing to the public than NME's because its clearer to read and laid out in a more user friendly manner. Looking at mine i believe that it has a more eyecatching appear than the NME despite follwoing a style of music magazine layout.
Looking at my double page spread I believe this one works well in the way i have laid it out. Looking at it i believe it is of a similar style to that of NME's double page spread however with my own individual twist. This is because i believe the style of the amount of writing on that page of NME was too much. On my double page it has less writing which i believe works better. However mine still follows similar conventions to that which NME stick to such as the house style colour scheme, of blue black, white and grey. Similar to that of NME which follows its colour scheme of Black white green and grey. Mine also follows the conventions of quotes within the page and smaller pictures on the spread. I believe my double page has followed conventions well and looks goood and to a professional standard.